|
- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Tuesday 29 May 2012Justices Reject Appeal by Former Iran Hostages
NYTimes.com – The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the last legal appeal for former American hostages seeking compensation for their captivity in Iran three decades ago, leaving legislation newly introduced in Congress as the last chance to resolve their longstanding grievance. A lower court, acting at the request of the State Department, previously blocked the hostages’ effort to win compensation from Iran, holding that the agreement under which they were released barred such claims. The former hostages had sued under a 1996 law that they argued allowed them to seek damages, and in August 2001 they won a judgment of liability, because Iran did not appear in court to defend itself. But the State Department argued that its ability to conduct foreign policy would be compromised if damages were awarded. The Supreme Court, as is its custom, did not give a reason for its decision on Tuesday. Fifty-two Americans were held hostage for 444 days after Iranian radicals seized the American Embassy in Tehran in 1979. “I would never have thought when I was getting kicked around in Iran that my own government would ever go to court to stop me," said David M. Roeder, a retired Air Force colonel who was the named plaintiff in the case. But after 12 years of legal wrangling, he said he was not surprised by the outcome. “It’s not just this administration or Clinton or even the Bush administration; there seems to be some sort of a weird hands-off-Iran policy,’’ he said. The approximately 100 people named in the suit, which included former hostages and some of their survivors, were seeking $10,000 a day, or $4.4 million each. According to their lawyers, money deposited in the United States by Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi of Iran before he was forced from power and frozen by the Carter administration after the hostages were taken is still available. Mr. Roeder and the other plaintiffs are hopeful that Congress will act again. On May 17, Representative Bruce Braley, an Iowa Democrat, and Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Florida Republican who is chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, introduced legislation that would double the fines against companies that are caught doing business with Iran. Half of the money would be used to compensate the former hostages. The bill would also let the president use frozen Iranian assets. Mr. Braley’s district includes the residence of one former hostage, Kathryn L. Koob. Mr. Braley said that when Congress returned to Washington he would seek support from other members who represented districts where former hostages lived. Ms. Ros-Lehtinen has been a vocal supporter of the hostages’ case for years. When it occurred, the taking of the hostages convulsed American politics and gave an impression of impotence under the presidency of Jimmy Carter; it also contributed to the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980. The hostages were freed on the day he was inaugurated. |