- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Saturday 22 January 2011The security office of the judiciary will be reinstatedRooz Online Despite the proliferation of intelligence and security agencies in Iran including the Intelligence Ministry and the various offices of intelligence and security forces within the Revolutionary Guards (IRGC), the army, the police, as well as the intelligence and security office of the judiciary branch of government, the head of Iran’s judiciary Sadegh Larijani complained of “not receiving sufficient assistance from security agencies” and pleaded for the “reinstatement and reactivation of the security and intelligence unit” of the judiciary. Speaking at a gathering yesterday in the presence of managers of security/intelligence units of the judiciary, ayatollah Shahroodi said, “One of the achievements of the previous judiciary administration was the establishment of the security and intelligence office which performs a critical role in maintaining the independence of the judiciary system and protects it from possible interference by various organizations and offices.” Referring to “the legal status of judiciary’s security and intelligence office”, Sadegh Larijani added, “According to the article 158 of the constitution, creation of judiciary establishments in concordance with the goals stated in the article 156 is the responsibility of the head of the judiciary; clearly articulated in the same article is the mandate of the head of the judiciary to develop organizational structures adequate for detection and prevention of crimes.” Without mentioning the opposing views in this regard, he said, “This is a wrong interpretation that the head of the judiciary is required to submit proposals to the government or the parliament in order to create the needed establishments within the judiciary administration. For the article 157 has stated all the conditions requiring the submission of judiciary proposals to the government and the parliament, and there would be pointless to have a separate article giving permission to the head of the judiciary to create new offices; to create here has a clear meaning”. Such an office already exists within the judiciary organizational structure though with a “supervisory mandate”. Rather, Larijani’s argument points to his desire to re-define the activities of this office towards “an operational approach”. In a different part of his speech, the head of the judiciary by mentioning that “in some cases the security and intelligence organizations do not help the judiciary system” emphasized, “ meanwhile the judiciary cannot stay idle and has to proceed with its legal mandate”. Having previously criticized “the interference of some security organizations”, Larijani clarified, “Unfortunately, whenever we are dealing with important investigations, such political oppositions are raised in order for the judiciary to change its pursuit of truth but they should all know that we are persistent in this path”. Though he did not mention any specific case but most likely he was referring to the first vice president, Mohammad Reza Rahimi, who has been accused of financial corruption by the judiciary and some members of the parliament. |