- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Friday 05 August 2011Iran Tightens Screws on Internet Users, Again
By the end of August, if Tehran’s plans progress as announced, Iranians going online will find themselves restricted to communicating only with each other—under the watchful eye of Iran’s cyber censors. Plans for an all-Iranian intranet to replace access to the Web were announced in early July by Iran’s Communication and Information Minister (an Orwellian title if ever there was one), Reza Taqipour Anvari. From Tehran’s point of view, a “National Internet”—or “Clean Internet,” as it is also described—would take already considerable efforts at control to a new level. There are also plans for a national Iranian search engine, “Ya Haq” (Oh Just One), which is scheduled to debut in early 2012. The purported aim is to “better manage national emails and information gathering within the country and improve security,” the minister said. From a government point of view, this is eminently desirable. The position of the Iranian government vis-à-vis the Internet has evolved dramatically over the past decade. Initially, according to Freedom House’s “Freedom on the Net 2011,” Tehran regarded the Internet as a catalyst for economic and scientific development. It was first introduced into the country by the Iranian government in the 1990s, and the government of President Mohammad Khatami invested heavily in Internet infrastructure, connecting cities with fiber-optic cables. By the beginning of 2000, there were 625,000 Internet users in Iran; just five years later, several million. Today, the Internet reaches one-third of Iran’s 75 million people. Iran has had one of the most active and thriving Internet communities, particularly excelling in poetry and blogs. However, in 2001, Supreme leader Ali Khatami and the Cultural Revolution High Council began to clamp down on freedom of expression online, as Internet activism was perceived as a political threat. Following the June 2009 presidential election, Internet censorship went into high gear with the creation of the Iranian Cyber Army. The 2011 Freedom House report ranks Iran as “Not Free,” with rampant website blocking, political censorship, and arrests of bloggers and online users. From the perspective of Iran’s burgeoning generation of bloggers, citizen reporters, and Web activists, the arrival of an Iranian intranet would be a further blow and a technological challenge. Try as they might, for countries like Iran, China, and Cuba, controlling the march of technology is a constant and consuming effort. As has invariably been the case with other attempts at controlling freedom-advancing technologies—from the printed word to fax machines, satellite dishes, and cell phones—this tug-of-war will eventually favor those who seek freedom. They very much deserve our support and aid. Source: The Heritage Foundation |