|
- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Monday 19 December 2011UK has started preemptive cold war against IranTehran Times TEHRAN – Iranian former ambassador to France Sadeq Kharrazi has said that the United Kingdom has started a “preemptive cold war” against Iran by declaring financial sanctions against Iran. On November 21, Britain put a ban on dealing with any Iranian banks, including the central bank. In reaction to such measures the Iranian parliament overwhelmingly approved a proposal on November 2 3 calling for a reduction in the level of ties with Britain. In an interview with ISNA, which was published on Monday, Kharrazi said the reaction of the Iranian parliament against London was natural as Britain’s aggressive behavior against Iran could not be underestimated. Kharrazi said that the British government should have come to the conclusion that having full diplomatic relations with Iran and committing hostile acts against it at the same time would not be possible. However, the former diplomat expressed dismay over the storming of the British embassy in Tehran, saying such behaviors do not benefit the country at the present time. On November 29, after a demonstration held to protest against the British government’s hostile policies toward Iran in front of the British embassy in Tehran, a number of students from various universities entered the British embassy compound and pulled down the Union Jack. Kharrazi said the European countries have distanced themselves from Iran and the reason for such distance can be sought in developments that have taken place on both sides of the Atlantic and the deterrent policies adopted by Iranian officials. Once Europe played an effective role on both sides of the Atlantic, but for many reasons it has lost its role, Kharrazi added. Elections are best means to counter threats Kharrazi called on Iranian officials, political elites, parties, and intellectuals to be further vigilant against traps of arrogant powers than before and said that the most important means to counteract software and hardware threats against Iran is “elections”. The former diplomat was indirectly suggesting that the Islamic Republic’s system should provide an opportunity in which people with different political persuasions can enthusiastically and massively participate in elections and thereby demonstrate their national unity, a tool which can neutralize threats against the country. “Election can solidify the foundations of Iran’s political system. On the other hand election can turn into the most important problem. Election in Iran is both an opportunity and a threat,” he commented. |