|
- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Saturday 05 May 2012A nuclear Iran more dangerous than military strike
Former Military Intelligence chief Maj. Gen. (res.) Amos Yadlin said on Saturday that a nuclear Iran would be more dangerous than carrying out a military strike on Iran. Speaking from the crowd in respone to a panel discussion at the Washington Institute's 2012 Weinberg Founders Conference in Virginia, Yadlin said Iran has a "sophisticated" strategy to pursue nuclear weapons and added his assessment that this strategy is "unfortunately" working. Yadlin said he favored exhausting all other options before striking Iran's nuclear facilities but stressed that a "nuclear Iran is more dangerous than attacking Iran." "If they can't be contained when they don't have nuclear weapon, how can they be contained when they do?" Yadlin said. "I am sure they won't launch nuclear bomb the moment they get it, but the possibility as a result of miscalculations and lack of stability, they will launch nuclear missile - it's not a possibility you can ignore," Yadlin continued. "The flying time of a missile from Tehran to Tel Aviv is seven minutes and the temptation for first strike is huge." "If you really want all options on the table, you need to be very credible with the military option," Yadlin said. During the panel discussion, Dennis Ross, formerly U.S. President Barack Obama's senior Middle East adviser, said that diplomacy might succeed in stopping Iran's nuclear program. "Why would it work now?" he said. "Now the Iranians are under pressure they've never been before. They are isolated internationally, the power balance in region has shifted against them…When they started making threats about shutting the Strait of Hormuz, a very blunt message was sent to them - and they backed [down]." Jamie Fly, a former adviser to the George W. Bush administration, spoke about the need to prepare a robust military option. "Are we as nation serious about preventing a nuclear Iran or just serious about talking about preventing a nuclear Iran? We don't want to spend decades in trying to contain a nuclear Iran," he said. "We need to take a more serious look at the military option," Fly added. "I don't agree that we have time, diplomacy is unlikely to work given the record of the Iranians." Source: Haaretz |