- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Friday 15 June 2012Time to do something about Iran
The Washington Post - It is not exactly clear whether the group is saying that a military strike is now required or whether tougher oil sanctions or other, less dramatic military action (e.g., a blockade) would suffice. That said, the debate should get going, preferably in advance of the next round of meaningless talks with the Iranians. How can we tell if sanctions have failed? What is left to do? The president, I suspect, is vamping, hoping to delay action and just get through the election. (True, the Israelis may act in the meantime.) But Congress need not remain silent. Where is the conference committee for the sanctions bill? On Wednesday Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) put out a memo, the summary of which states: On May 21, 2012, the U.S. Senate passed its version of a new Iran sanctions bill, laying the groundwork for conference negotiations with the House, which passed its own Iran sanctions bill late last year. Since then, a second round of P5+1 talks with Iran failed, negotiations with Iran over access to a suspected military site broke down, an Iranian-linked assassination plot targeting U.S. officials was revealed, Iranian leaders defended their “right” to enrich uranium to 20 percent, the United Nations nuclear watchdog reported Iran is accelerating its production of low enriched uranium at 3.5 percent, and the human rights situation in Iran continued to deteriorate. Therefore, unless during talks in Moscow next week Iran agrees to 1) halt all uranium enrichment at all levels, 2) remove all material that has been enriched from Iran, and 3) dismantle the regime’s underground nuclear bunker in Qom, the House and Senate should immediately move forward with negotiations over a final Iran sanctions law — incorporating new, tough and bipartisan sanctions proposals — that can be sent to the President’s desk before the August recess. That is at least a start. Sitting mutely by on the sidelines while the centrifuges keep spinning in Iran is a dereliction of duty by Congress. Unlike President Obama, however, I think there are lawmakers willing to step up to the plate. History will judge them well. |