|
- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Saturday 28 July 2012Iranian navy’s sea legs wobblyBostonHerald.com Last September, Iran’s top naval commander warned in a speech that his country planned to send military ships near U.S. sea borders. “Like the arrogant powers that are present near our marine borders,” Rear Adm. Habibollah Sayyari said, “we will also have a powerful presence close to the American marine borders.” Apparently worried that the message didn’t make the desired impression the first time, Iran’s top naval commander announced again Tuesday that Iranian warships soon would cruise the Atlantic. The White House said it didn’t take the statements seriously, especially considering that the Iranian navy has been able to enter the Mediterranean exactly twice in recent history: in a two-ship visit to Egypt shortly after the fall of that country’s president, Hosni Mubarak, in February 2011 and in a two-ship visit last February to Iran’s beleaguered ally, Syria. This hardly constitutes global naval reach. Iran’s first foray into the Atlantic may be to send a warship and a supply vessel to accompany Syria’s first domestically built tanker, a 21,000-ton vessel it is selling to Venezuela. Not to disparage Iran’s accomplishment, but 21,000 tons is almost a lifeboat compared to the monster tankers that are the backbone of international crude-oil shipping. Typically, these are ultra-large crude carriers — ULCCs — that run around 550,000 deadweight tons. Some even weigh over 600,000 tons. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez is calling for even closer ties between “justice-seeking nations like Iran and Venezuela.” This recalls the 2008 joint naval “maneuvers” between Russia and Venezuela that one Russian news outlet, in a burst of irrational exuberance, called a “fist in America’s belly.” The Russians sent several ships: the guided-missile cruiser Peter the Great, an anti-submarine destroyer, a supply ship and a tugboat. The presence of the oceangoing tug, sent along in case one of the other ships broke down, rather diluted the effect. Putting its ships in the Atlantic is clearly a matter of pride to Iran and its navy. We would only caution: Watch out for hurricane season. Dale McFeatters writes for Scripps Howard News Service. |