- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Monday 02 December 2013Senators take aim at Iran deal
The Wall Street Journal The White House on Sunday faced sharp criticism of the Iran nuclear deal struck last week from members of both parties who say the accord doesn’t go far enough. The U.S. and five other counties reached an interim deal to freeze the expansion of Iran’s nuclear program while broader negotiations take place. But even some Democrats in Congress say the U.S. gave up too much. “I’m concerned about some elements,” Sen. Robert Menendez (D., N.J.) said Sunday on CBS’s “Face the Nation.” He’s particularly worried about a sunset clause that could allow Iran to be treated as a non-nuclear weapons state. “That means that they could, after that period of time, enrich uranium without any consequence and without any limitations,” he said. Mr. Menendez, chairman of Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he’s also upset that the Obama administration is pressuring Congress to not impose further sanctions on Iran during the negotiations. The senator said Congress should be allowed to act, but have any new sanctions halted by a comprehensive deal. Sen. Bob Corker (R., Tenn.) offered even stronger doubts, calling the pact “a total victory” for Iran. “It’s very difficult to understand that at the height of our leverage…we negotiated a deal of this nature with not a single centrifuge being dismantled,” he said on the same program. “All of them spinning in perpetuity for the next six months.” He said the deal is likely to cause other nations in the Middle East to seek to boost their weapons arsenals and sends the wrong message to Vietnam, South Korea and other countries “that have played by the rules.” Meanwhile, President Obama’s former national security adviser, Tom Donilon, praised the deal. “It’s a very solid achievement,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.” “It’s a very good foundation as a backdrop against which to have comprehensive negotiations.” Mr. Donilon balked at the notion that Iran can use the six-month negotiating window to bolster its capabilities, saying the deal freezes the program in place and addresses the most contentious plutonium-producing reactor. The deal is the top achievement so far of the Obama administration’s Iran agenda, he said. U.S. policies opened the door for the election of Iran’s President Hasan Rouhani, a more moderate leader, and ultimately the latest talks. “There is a direct line here between the sanctions, [Mr.] Rouhani’s election, and their coming to the table.” Mr. Donilon said. “Why? Because we put tremendous pressure on the Iranian economy. “ |