- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Sunday 15 December 2013Egyptian Analyst Accuses the West Of Selling Out on Iran Dealwww.memri.org Mustafa Al-Fiqi, an Egyptian politician who held senior posts under Mubarak, including deputy foreign minister and chairman of the parliamentary foreign relations committee, recently devoted his regular column in the Egyptian daily Al-Yawm Al-Sabi' to a sharp attack on the U.S. for the nuclear agreement with Iran. Al-Fiqi accused the U.S. of betraying its Arab allies and surrendering to the unbending Iranian policy despite its status as the world’s strongest superpower. He claimed that the lesson that the Arabs should draw from this agreement is that the West, headed by the U.S., understands only the language of force. "Iran has managed to score an interim achievement for its nuclear policy, and we must learn the lesson [from this], which is that the West understands only the language of force, and it signs an armistice with a brazen country more readily than it accepts the policy of a country that has been its ally for years. "It is the West that has sold out the region to extremist religious movements; it is the West that wants the Arab and Muslim world to wallow in internal conflict that will keep [the Arabs and Muslims] away from it; it is the West that, in the final result, negotiated with Iran and signed a historic agreement with it despite [this country's] diplomatic measures that are provocative to the U.S., be it [Iran's policy] in Syria or the Gulf, or Hizbullah’s [behavior]. "Indeed, Washington respects only the language of force and the [opposing country's] sense that it is on a par with [the U.S.]. The U.S. understands that the word 'no' [that it heard from Iran] was meant as a warning… The Iranian nuclear agreement revealed the effectiveness of [Iran's] 'brinkmanship' diplomacy. That is why Washington and its allies ignored Israel’s objections and preferred to go their own way: because they understood that sometimes there is an 'important' [interest] and a 'still more important' [interest]. "Additionally, the U.S. sold out the Christians of the East as part of dubious agreements with religious and terrorist forces, and did so for Israel’s benefit, and then it gradually sold out Israel for a strategic agreement with Iran. I think that this agreement is not the end of the road, and I will hazard to say that Israel is contemplating making some foolish military move against Tehran should the nuclear enrichment program continue to progress." |