- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Tuesday 14 January 2014Rouhani boasts of West's 'surrender' to Iran in nuclear talksJPost WASHINGTON - World powers have "surrendered" to Iranian interests upon the implementation of the interim nuclear deal forged in Geneva, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani said on Wednesday. Sending out the message via Twitter, Rouhani said Iran's relationship with the world is based on Iran's national interests, and that the Geneva agreement marked a global surrender to Iran's "national will." The United States brushed off the remark, with White House press secretary Jay Carney calling it unsurprising. "The Iranians are describing the agreement in a certain way for their domestic audience," Carney told reporters on Wednesday. "It doesn't matter what they say. It matters what they do." The interim deal was reached in November between Iran and the P5+1— the US, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China and Germany— and will officially begin on January 20, when Iran will begin halting its enrichment of uranium, and construction at a heavy-water plutonium plant in Arak, in exchange for $7-10 billion in sanctions relief. The parties will then have six months to negotiate a comprehensive solution to the longstanding nuclear impasse, with the option of another six month extension should all parties agree to do so. The first step toward comprehensive negotiations will likely be strategic planning on the part of the P5, State Department deputy spokeswoman Marie Harf said on Wednesday. Talks with the Iranians are not expected to begin until late February, after world powers agree on a framework on which to proceed. The Los Angeles Times reported on Wednesday that a side deal had been reached between the US and Iran regarding implementation of the Geneva deal that would not be made public. The report asserted that the "nonpaper" included details of how the joint commission overseeing the deal's implementation would be operated. But the Los Angeles outlet misreported the definition of nonpaper as a diplomatic term: such a proposal is a draft, not an official document, in foreign relations. Nevertheless, the claim is being taken seriously by those already skeptical of the deal in Washington. “We are deeply concerned by recent reports that the Obama Administration has negotiated what some are calling a ‘secret side deal’ with Iran regarding the future of its nuclear program," Senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain said Wednesday in a joint statement. "Iran’s chief nuclear negotiator has claimed that, under this possible agreement, Iran will be permitted to keep all of its nuclear facilities open, continue its enrichment of uranium, and maintain and even expand its nuclear research, including into next-generation centrifuges." Responding to the report, Carney said that the "technical plans were submitted to the IAEA" and that no secret agreement exists. "There's nothing secret here," Harf said. "We will make the text available to Congress and the public." |