- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Tuesday 04 February 2014Clinton backs Obama on Iran sanctions
The Hill By Julian Pecquet Hillary Clinton is backing President Obama's diplomacy with Iran in a move that could hurt her with major Jewish donors as she ponders a 2016 run. Clinton has avoided weighing in publicly on the issue since the Obama administration struck an interim nuclear deal with Iran in November. In a letter to Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich.), however, Clinton weighed in against a bipartisan sanctions push that's stuck in the Senate. “I share the opinion of you and many of your colleagues that these sanctions and the carefully constructed global consensus behind them are responsible for driving Tehran to the negotiating table,” she wrote to Levin in the Jan. 26 letter. “Now that serious negotiations are finally under way, we should do everything we can to test whether they can advance a permanent solution. As President Obama said, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed, while keeping all options on the table.” Levin held up the letter as a “strong signal” that Congress would be wrong to pass sanctions now. “This is a thoughtful, persuasive argument from an experienced, respected senior official. It makes clear Secretary Clinton's belief that tough sanctions helped bring Iran to the negotiating table, and that Congress and the administration are poised to act if Iran violates its commitments or fails to negotiate in good faith toward a final agreement,” he said in an emailed statement. “Her letter is another strong signal to Congress that we should not take any legislative action at this time that would damage international unity or play into the hands of hard-liners in Iran who oppose negotiations,” he added. The White House argues that passing sanctions now would scuttle diplomacy and Obama vowed to veto such a bill during his State of the Union address on Tuesday. Some 59 senators have signed on to sanctions legislation, but at least four Democratic co-sponsors have said now is not the right time for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) to bring the bill up for a vote. |