- Iran: Eight Prisoners Hanged on Drug Charges
- Daughter of late Iranian president jailed for ‘spreading lies’ - IRAN: Annual report on the death penalty 2016 - Taheri Facing the Death Penalty Again - Dedicated team seeking return of missing agent in Iran - Iran Arrests 2, Seizes Bibles During Catholic Crackdown
- Trump to welcome Netanyahu as Palestinians fear U.S. shift
- Details of Iran nuclear deal still secret as US-Tehran relations unravel - Will Trump's Next Iran Sanctions Target China's Banks? - Don’t ‘tear up’ the Iran deal. Let it fail on its own. - Iran Has Changed, But For The Worse - Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Female Activist Criticizes Rouhani’s Failure to Protect Citizens
- Iran’s 1st female bodybuilder tells her story - Iranian lady becomes a Dollar Millionaire on Valentine’s Day - Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran - 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran - Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- Senior Senators, ex-US officials urge firm policy on Iran
- In backing Syria's Assad, Russia looks to outdo Iran - Six out of 10 People in France ‘Don’t Feel Safe Anywhere’ - The liberal narrative is in denial about Iran - Netanyahu urges Putin to block Iranian power corridor - Iran Poses ‘Greatest Long Term Threat’ To Mid-East Security |
Wednesday 21 January 2015US Senate pushes for new Iran sanctions if talks fail
A leading U.S. senator, despite resistance, is still pushing for new sanctions against the Iranian regime over its nuclear program, but claimed that he would be willing to set aside his efforts, if Obama would succumb to any agreement with Tehran, and let the Congress lawmakers accordingly reject or approve it. Imposing such sanctions on the Iranian regime, to force it to curtail its nuclear weapons program has strong bilateral support in Congress. However, what has been made clear by them is that these proposed sanctions would go into effect only if the negotiations fail. Moreover, if the June 30th deadline is not met, they would have no choice except for going forward with such strict action. This is not the first time the US has imposed sanctions on Iran , where the Menendez-Kirk sanctions bill was introduced in December 2013 for the same purpose, but did not come up for vote in the Senate when it was controlled by President Barack Obama's fellow Democrats. The White House insisted its passage could endanger international negotiations on Iran’s nuclear program, for which it did not push these sanctions too much. The United States, France, Germany, Britain, Russia and China reached a preliminary agreement with Iran in 2013 for it to suspend its sensitive nuclear activity in return for easing some economic sanctions. However, all sides failed to meet a self-imposed deadline for a second time in December and extended the preliminary accord by seven months. This callous attitude amongst countries angered the US lawmakers where they demanded President Obama to be more coercive with the Iranian regime. The Obama administration has still qualms about these sanctions, calling them a disruption to a possible good outcome, regarding international relations. Senator Ron Johnson, Wisconsin Republican and chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, however has rejected the administrations claim by saying that he has no faith in Obama’s ability to negotiate a deal that would stop the Iranian regime from developing nuclear weapons. For him imposing these additional sanctions is the only way to make sure Iran does not use its nuclear assets in anyway, that would cause harm or be a threat. He even agreed to the possibility of imposing penalties on the Iranian regime, if they continued to pursue nuclear arms. Senator Robert Menendez of New Jersey is the most prominent member on the committee, where he has declared to take harsh steps against the regime, if they refused to cooperate. Supporters of Iran sanctions in the U.S. Senate have disclosed a popular bill, one aimed at gaining enough votes to override a presidential veto. Their long-awaited bill was made public on Friday but has not been formally introduced in the Senate, where it would gradually impose sanctions against Iran , by July 1, if no final deal is reached in the talks between Tehran and the P5+1 group, consisting of United States, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia. |