- Northwestern Iran: Prisoner Hanged in Public
- Vigil to be held for British-Iranian mother jailed in Iran
- The Christians of Iran
- Iran: 26 Prisoners Including Two Women Hanged
- Saeed Shirzad “Before It’s Too Late,” Warns Lawyer
- IRGS Blocking Temporary Release of Canadian Resident
- Iran nuclear deal ‘on life support,’ Priebus says
- Trump preserves his options on Israel and Iran
- Trump's Deal Threats Hang Over Iran’s Election
- The Iran tab: Full cost in question
- Mullas Received ‘Billions’ From Obama Administration in Cash, Gold & Assets
- Priebus: 'Yet to Be Seen' If Iran Deal Will Stand
- Two women arrested after being filmed riding motorbike in Iran
- 43,000 Cases of Child Marriage in Iran
- Woman Investigating Clinton Foundation Child Trafficking KILLED!
- More women in Iran are forgoing marriage. One reason? The men aren't good enough
- Iran’s Brutal Treatment of Female Political Prisoners
- Women, Iran, and Democratization
- Secret details emerge on Iran’s Cyber Army
- Mattis: ISIS ‘couldn’t last 2 minutes in fight with our troops’
- Iran’s rising influence raises Saudi eyebrows
- DNC frontrunner Ellison Met Privately With Osama Bin Laden Supporter
- Is Iran Developing Chemical/Biological Weapons?
- 10 Things We Should Learn From the Ohio State Attack
Tuesday 06 December 2016
Recent cyberattacks have frozen an unspecified number of computers at two government agencies in Saudi Arabia, and security experts say it is likely that Iran is behind the digital mayhem.
The attacks are believed to have affected thousands of computers at the Saudi civil aviation and transportation agencies, harkening back to a devastating Iranian cyberattack in 2012 that nearly crippled the Saudi state oil company, Aramco.
The Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, the nation’s central bank, denied a Bloomberg report last week that it was hit, too.
Cybersecurity experts caution that they cannot say for sure that the attacks that began Nov. 17 are from Iranian hackers. But they note a series of similarities to the 2012 cyberattack and say Iranian hackers are especially active.
“Since the (U.S.) election especially, there’s been a pretty drastic increase in the amount of targeting of Saudi and Israeli institutions by hacking groups that we absolutely know are based out of Iran,” said Collin Anderson, an independent researcher currently writing a report on Iranian cyber warfare for the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Anderson said “reasonable degrees of evidence” link the hacking to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran’s most powerful security and military organization.
Cyber experts commonly refer to the malicious code infecting Saudi computers as Shamoon 2.0, a new version of the Shamoon malware that hit Aramco in 2012. The code is also known as disttrack.
“The infection capability doesn’t cause any particular hardware damage we know of but it does ‘brick’ your computer,” said George Avetisov, cofounder and chief executive of HYPR Biometric Security, a New York City firm that handles cybersecurity solutions for clients.
A “bricked” computer is one left completely useless, like a brick.
The malicious attack began at 8:45 p.m. on Thursday, Nov. 17, the start of the weekend in Saudi Arabia, where employees work Sunday to Thursday. That allowed the virus to spread for days before employees returned. It also marked the beginning of Lailat al Qadr (Night of Decree), an important Muslim holiday that is the holiest night of the year.
The Shamoon 2.0 malware wiped hard drives in infected computers clean and left an image of the lifeless body of a 3-year-old Syrian boy, Alan Kurdi, who was found on a Turkish beach 15 months ago and became a symbol of the European refugee crisis. The 2012 Shamoon attack left an image of a burning U.S. flag.
How many Saudi computers were destroyed in the recent attack is not known.
“Historically, Saudi Arabia has been very opaque about these sorts of attacks,” Anderson said.
Avetisov said the recent attacks were “not particularly stealthy” because the infection spread through a specific software driver, almost a calling card from Iranian hackers.
“As someone who scours the internet looking at false flags,” he said, referring to deceptive covert operations made to look like they were done by someone other than the real authors, “I can’t see a motive. What would you achieve with a false flag like this?”
He said attacks on key government agencies can be testing for further attacks.
“Usually you see attacks of a large scale as potentially a precursor for a much larger event. It remains to be seen if that’s the case here,” Avetisov said.
The Iranian hackers appeared to use email as bait to implant the malware.
“These are crimes of opportunity essentially,” Anderson said. “It’s really like these Iranian groups getting lucky based off of social engineering rather than, you know, highly technical operations conducted with zero day exploits.”
Anderson referred to a type of vulnerability that can give an attacker freedom within a host computer system to wreak havoc. Such vulnerabilities are usually detected by large teams of elite hackers working for governments.
The U.S.-Israeli cyber worm known as Stuxnet at the turn of the decade destroyed a great number of centrifuges Iran was using for its nuclear weapons program.
“Especially for Iran, there’s not really a lot of costs involved with these activities . . . not a lot of chance that anyone is going to get extradited,” Anderson said.